Get Da 2166 9 1 Form

Filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form is a crucial part of the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Here are seven key takeaways to consider:

• Accurate Information is Essential: Ensure that all administrative data in Part I is filled out accurately. This includes the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, and unit information.
• Understand the Purpose: The form serves to evaluate an NCO’s performance and potential. It is used to document achievements and areas for improvement.
• Rater and Senior Rater Responsibilities: The rater and senior rater must provide their signatures and ensure that their assessments are fair and based on observable performance.
• Counseling Dates Matter: Document counseling dates accurately. These dates reflect when the NCO received feedback on their performance and are critical for the evaluation process.
• Performance Evaluation Criteria: Pay close attention to the performance evaluation sections. Comments should address the NCO’s character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievements.
• Overall Potential Assessment: The senior rater must select the appropriate box to reflect the rated NCO's potential compared to peers. This assessment can impact future assignments and promotions.
• Review and Verify: Before submission, both the rated NCO and the raters should review the completed form to ensure all information is correct. This verification step is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the evaluation.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other documents serve similar purposes in assessing performance, qualifications, and potential. Here are eight documents that share similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1:

• DA Form 67-9: This form is used for officer evaluations. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it assesses performance and potential, providing a comprehensive review of an officer's contributions and capabilities.
• Texas VTR-60: This form facilitates the replacement of vehicle license plates or registration stickers, similar to the evaluation and assessment processes, as it ensures that vehicle documentation is maintained. For more information, you can visit txtemplate.com/texas-vtr-60-pdf-template.
• DA Form 1059: This document is used to evaluate soldiers who complete a training course. It captures performance during the course, similar to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 captures performance over a specified period.
• DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the evaluation form for NCOs in higher grades. It serves a similar function, focusing on performance and potential, but is tailored for more senior NCOs.
• DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions. It documents discussions about performance and expectations, much like the feedback provided in the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 5000-1: This form is used for documenting the evaluation of enlisted personnel. It assesses various aspects of performance, paralleling the evaluation criteria found in the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 3349: This document is used to evaluate soldiers with medical profiles. It assesses how medical conditions affect performance, similar to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 evaluates overall NCO performance.
• DA Form 703: This form is used for documenting the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It provides a record of physical fitness, which is also a critical component of the evaluations in the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 2166-8: This is a performance evaluation for junior enlisted soldiers. It evaluates their potential and performance, similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1 but aimed at lower ranks.

Each of these forms plays a role in the overall evaluation process within the Army, ensuring that personnel are assessed fairly and comprehensively.

Misconceptions about the DA Form 2166-9-1 can lead to confusion and mismanagement in evaluations. Understanding these common misunderstandings can help ensure that the evaluation process runs smoothly and effectively.

• Misconception 1: The DA Form 2166-9-1 is only for NCOs.

This form is primarily used for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), but it is also applicable to certain situations involving other ranks. Understanding its broader application can enhance clarity in evaluations.

• Misconception 2: Signing the form means agreement with the evaluation.

Many believe that signing the form indicates agreement with the rater's assessment. In reality, the signature only verifies that the administrative data is correct and that the rated NCO has seen the report.

• Misconception 3: The rater's comments are the only evaluations that matter.

While the rater's comments are crucial, the senior rater's input also plays a significant role. Both perspectives contribute to a comprehensive evaluation of the NCO's performance.

• Misconception 4: All evaluations are the same regardless of the period covered.

Evaluations can vary significantly based on the time frame they cover. Each period may reflect different challenges and accomplishments, which should be considered when assessing performance.

• Misconception 5: The form is only a bureaucratic requirement.

Some view the DA Form 2166-9-1 as merely a formality. However, it serves a vital purpose in professional development and career progression, helping to identify strengths and areas for improvement.

• Misconception 6: The evaluation process is not subject to review.

Many assume that once submitted, the evaluation is final. However, there is an appeals process outlined in AR 623-3, allowing rated NCOs to address any discrepancies or concerns regarding their evaluations.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. It serves to provide a structured assessment of an NCO's duties, responsibilities, and overall potential. Along with this form, several other documents are commonly utilized to support the evaluation process. Each of these documents plays a vital role in ensuring that the evaluation is comprehensive and accurate.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and their subordinates. The form captures the discussion points, goals, and any action plans that arise from these sessions. This documentation helps provide context for the evaluations on the DA Form 2166-9-1.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report (NCOER) form. It is used for senior NCOs and provides a comprehensive evaluation of their performance over a specific period. The insights gathered from this form can complement the information on the DA Form 2166-9-1, particularly when assessing an NCO's career progression.
• Georgia WC-100: This form is crucial for facilitating the mediation process for workers' compensation claims in Georgia. For more details and to access the form, visit Georgia PDF.
• DA Form 705: This form is used to record the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). Physical fitness is a crucial aspect of an NCO's duties, and this form helps document whether the NCO meets the Army's physical standards. It is often referenced in the evaluation process to provide a complete picture of the NCO's capabilities.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to record body fat measurements for soldiers who do not meet Army weight standards. Maintaining proper weight and body composition is essential for NCOs. These forms help ensure that any weight-related issues are documented and considered during evaluations.

In summary, the DA Form 2166-9-1 is often accompanied by various other forms that enrich the evaluation process. Each document contributes unique insights that allow leaders to make informed assessments of their NCOs. Together, they help foster a culture of accountability and professional development within the Army.